Introduction
The political dysfunctional of Australia within recent years, is evidence prove that the Australia Government Structure is outdated and needed major upgrade. The Commonwealth of Australia Government structure, is introduced in 1911, over 106 years ago, when the population of Australia is a mere, 4.5 million. Today, Australia is a country of over 24 million. Flaws of Australia government structure, that would not cause problems, one hundred years ago, is now helping to create the issue of political dysfunctional and political disorganize for modern Australia.
The political dysfunctional of Australia within recent years, is evidence prove that the Australia Government Structure is outdated and needed major upgrade. The Commonwealth of Australia Government structure, is introduced in 1911, over 106 years ago, when the population of Australia is a mere, 4.5 million. Today, Australia is a country of over 24 million. Flaws of Australia government structure, that would not cause problems, one hundred years ago, is now helping to create the issue of political dysfunctional and political disorganize for modern Australia.
This series would explore flaws of Australia Government structure and how it is helping to create the issue of political dysfunction and political disorganize for modern Australia and what sort of upgrade will help resolve the problems.
The Civil servant examination system is something that is used in many countries in the world, including the US and UK. The principle of this system, is that none elected and none executive government officials of a country, should be employed by passing an exam. This has currently proven to be the most effective employment method for such public servants.
Traditionally, people usually rely on experience and
qualification, to determine the capability of a person. However, these are not
the most accurate way to measure who is most qualify.
In terms of experience, true, some job requires a certain
level of experience to perform and sometime, when a person got more experience
that person become more qualify. But it is not always the case. Why? Take the
concept of “practice make perfect” for example, some people, after practicing
for only three times, become proficient, others, practice for ten times, and
still not proficient. Thus, although having more experience, increase the
chance of a person to be competent and a person with more experience is most
likely to be better qualify, then another person with less experience, it is
not necessary the case. But through examination, we can easily test, who is the
most qualify candidate, it is more likely that the candidate with more experience
is better qualify, but it might also turn out, the candidate with more
experience is unqualify or the person with less experience is more qualify.
In terms of qualification. First, from studying in school,
we learn, two students studying the same material taught by the same teacher,
most likely, one student is going to do better than another that is why we need
exam. In university, different students would be of different standard, despite
taking the same class, taught by the same teacher, that is why, for each
university subject, you get graded on a series of exam and/or assessments, to
test your knowledge on the subject, you been taught in. But even after the
grading, a problem is that, different University got different standard and
marking criteria. For example, in Sydney University, you must include material
outside those been taught in the subject, to get a mark, above credit, in
Macquarie University, you need to demonstrate knowledge in materials outside
the subject, within your assessment, to get a mark that is more then pass. In
University of Technology Sydney, such requirement of demonstrate additional
knowledge outside the subject, is unnecessary, to get any mark. Thus, once
again, the best way to test who is the most qualify candidate, for the
position, is through exam.
Like gun powder, printing press and magnetic compass, civil
service examination system origin from China. The system was introduced between
the year of 581AC~619AC. Despite ancient Chinese believe all men are equals, both
King and peasants, prior to the introduction of civil servant examination, it
is usually the nobles that have a chance to become senior government officials
and officers in the army, ordinary peasants, only get to be lower ranking
government officials and lower ranking soldiers, in the army. To ensure, the
best people can get discover and promoted to the post, regardless of noble
birth or born as peasants, the Chinese for the first time, introduce the
concept of exam, to the world and then through exams, introduce the concept of
civil servant examination system, by the 18th century, this system
was passed to the west, it was first adopted by the French, follow by the
Americans and the British. This is due to, in the first 100 years of US
history, civil service is known for its corruption and incompetent. In UK, with
the introduction of constitution monarchy, the parliament seek to reduce the
power of the nobles, wanting to let, the people who are best for the job, to
hold the post, regardless of whether he is of noble or peasant birth.
Introduction
Chapter 1: Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 2: Legislative (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 3: Executive Government (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 4: Judicatory (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 5: Local Government (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 6: Rights and Responsibility (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 7: Officials of the Commonwealth (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 8: Yahweh (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 9: Foreign Invasion and Civil Unrest (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 10: When the Commonwealth become a Republic (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 11: Oath, Affirmation and Symbol (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 12: Miscellaneous (Constitution Reform Proposal)
(Donate to this Project)
Chapter 1: Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 2: Legislative (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 3: Executive Government (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 4: Judicatory (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 5: Local Government (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 6: Rights and Responsibility (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 7: Officials of the Commonwealth (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 8: Yahweh (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 9: Foreign Invasion and Civil Unrest (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 10: When the Commonwealth become a Republic (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 11: Oath, Affirmation and Symbol (Constitution Reform Proposal)
Chapter 12: Miscellaneous (Constitution Reform Proposal)
(Donate to this Project)
No comments:
Post a Comment